A Good Day to Die Hard is the franchise's worst film by a considerable margin and one of the most disappointing sequels in the action genre's history, a joyless and narratively incoherent film that wastes John McClane entirely, gives him a son of almost no dramatic interest, and delivers its action sequences with a visual chaos and incoherence that makes them the franchise's least enjoyable by a significant distance. John Moore's 2013 entry is not merely a bad Die Hard film. It is a bad film, a work of such fundamental dramatic incompetence and such complete misunderstanding of the character and the franchise that it makes Live Free or Die Hard look like a model of intelligence by comparison. A Good Day to Die Hard is the franchise's nadir, and it is a nadir of considerable depth.
At a Glance
Director: John Moore
Runtime: 98 minutes
Starring: Bruce Willis, Jai Courtney, Sebastian Koch, Yuliya Snigir, Cole Hauser
Release: 2013
Critics Rating: ★ (1/5 stars, the franchise's worst film)
Audience Rating: ★½ (1.5/5 stars, deeply disappointing)
Review Breakdown
Plot
McClane travels to Moscow to find his estranged son Jack, who is apparently on trial for murder but is actually a CIA operative on a mission to extract a political prisoner. The plot is the franchise's most narratively incoherent, a series of action sequences connected by dramatic logic of such fundamental inadequacy that the film's central conflict is never clearly established and its resolution is never satisfying. The Russian setting is used with almost no intelligence or cultural specificity, a generic Eastern European backdrop of limited visual interest and no sense of place. The Chernobyl sequence is the film's most spectacular set-piece and its most incoherent, a conclusion of such complete physical implausibility and limited dramatic consequence that it generates bewilderment rather than excitement.
Characters
McClane is given the franchise's least interesting material, a character whose everyman quality and wit are almost entirely absent from a film that reduces him to one-liners of diminishing quality and action sequences of diminishing consequence. Willis plays the character with a physical commitment the material does not deserve. Jai Courtney's Jack McClane is the franchise's most significant casting failure, a character of almost no dramatic interest and almost no chemistry with Willis. The father-son dynamic is handled with such superficiality and haste that it generates almost no emotional engagement.
Tone
Moore pitches the film at a register of relentless action spectacle with almost no tonal variation, generating considerable fatigue across the 98-minute runtime. A Good Day to Die Hard lacks the wit, tonal intelligence, and character investment that have always been the franchise's most important qualities. The action sequences are staged with a visual chaos and incoherence that makes them the franchise's least enjoyable.
Meaning / Themes
The film gestures toward fatherhood and estrangement, using the McClane father-son dynamic as a vehicle for exploring the consequences of John's professional dedication on his personal relationships. This is a thematic concern the franchise's established character history makes entirely appropriate, but the film handles it with such superficiality and haste that it never generates emotional engagement.
Direction
Moore's direction is the franchise's worst, a work of such fundamental incompetence and limited understanding of the character and the franchise that it makes the film's considerable technical resources feel entirely wasted. The action sequences are staged with a visual chaos and spatial incoherence that makes them the franchise's least enjoyable. The Moscow car chase is the film's most narratively inert major sequence, a set-piece of considerable physical scale and almost no tension.
Cultural Reception
A Good Day to Die Hard was a commercial disappointment and the franchise's most critically dismissed entry, receiving near-universal negative reviews on its release. Its reputation has not improved in the years since, and it is now consistently regarded as one of the most disappointing sequels in the action genre's history and as the creative failure that effectively ended the franchise's theatrical run.
Who Should Watch
Franchise completists only, approached with the lowest possible expectations. Those who are not committed franchise fans should watch the original and Die Hard with a Vengeance and stop there. The franchise deserved a better ending. So did McClane.
Final Verdict: The franchise's worst film by a considerable margin. Willis's McClane is wasted entirely, Courtney's Jack is the franchise's most significant creative failure, and Moore's direction demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the character and the franchise. It is a film that takes one of cinema's most beloved action heroes and gives him nothing worth doing in a setting of no dramatic interest with a son of no dramatic appeal. The franchise deserved a better ending. So did McClane.
0 comments